Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
MODERATED-Part 1 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
This course provides attorneys with a detailed examination of Form 1120S, including legal considerat...
AI tops the news seemingly every day. The technology is growing in use and application as lawyers, c...
This attorney-focused training provides deeper insight into GAAP’s framework and its legal app...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...