Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...