Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...