Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...