Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials and confidence can intimidate juries. It provides tools for leveling the playing field by challenging assumptions, narrowing opinions, and reframing expertise in accessible, relatable terms.
Through structured questioning and careful preparation, lawyers learn to expose bias, highlight limitations, and reinforce their own narrative—ensuring experts inform the case rather than dominate it.
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...