This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-world hypotheticals. Attendees will evaluate the duty of Competence (Rule 1.1) regarding AI hallucinations and Confidentiality (Rule 1.6) when vetting intake and drafting tools.
Learning objectives include establishing protocols for the Supervision (Rules 5.1 & 5.3) of AI-generated work, such as RFEs and petitions, to ensure professional accuracy and accountability.
Participants will leave with a framework for maintaining Candor (Rule 3.3) while leveraging automation to protect client interests and maintain ethical standards.
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...