Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not adopted, including scenarios with expert witness reports. Recently, a judge highlighted the issue of hallucinations and as one of the elements of the sanctions, required the attorney to take a 2-hour CLE on attorney utilization of generative AI. Moreover, for lawyers litigating in federal court, a proposed FRE related to AI is now open for public comment. The purpose of this presentation is to provide lawyers with ethics requirements, how to mitigate risk, evaluate AI software, compile policies and procedures for utilizing and submitting AI generated items to opposing counsel, clients and tribunals and delve into existing and proposed federal rules of procedure and evidence that are relevant to Gen AI.
Objectives:
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
We are at that time again. Resolution time. Or maybe they’re already nothing more than another...
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
This one-hour program will look at the key differences in policies available in the marketplace, dif...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...