Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...