Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...