Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...