Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This presentation provides a basic overview of AI governance in the United States for in-house attor...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...