Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
This course is meant for lawyers of all levels and areas of practice, and in it, we will explore way...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...