Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...