Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...