This program will discuss the rapidly evolving legal landscape of politicians’ use of social media and the important legal considerations for practitioners advising public officials and political candidates. The topics include the recent Supreme Court decision in Lindke v. Freed (regarding blocking constituents on social media), the U.S. House of Representatives Office of General Counsel’s guidance to Members about moderating and blocking social media users, and the effects of AI on politicians’ use of social media.
The learning objectives for attorneys include:
• Understand the best legal practices for politicians using social media.
• Understand the new caselaw developments in the social media space as they relate to politicians on social media.
• Understand the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on politicians’ use of social media.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...