This program will discuss the rapidly evolving legal landscape of politicians’ use of social media and the important legal considerations for practitioners advising public officials and political candidates. The topics include the recent Supreme Court decision in Lindke v. Freed (regarding blocking constituents on social media), the U.S. House of Representatives Office of General Counsel’s guidance to Members about moderating and blocking social media users, and the effects of AI on politicians’ use of social media.
The learning objectives for attorneys include:
• Understand the best legal practices for politicians using social media.
• Understand the new caselaw developments in the social media space as they relate to politicians on social media.
• Understand the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on politicians’ use of social media.
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Cybercriminals increasingly target law firms, attorneys, legal staff, and their clients through soph...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
For at least the last half-century, the success or failure of most litigations is determined by how ...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...