This program will discuss the rapidly evolving legal landscape of politicians’ use of social media and the important legal considerations for practitioners advising public officials and political candidates. The topics include the recent Supreme Court decision in Lindke v. Freed (regarding blocking constituents on social media), the U.S. House of Representatives Office of General Counsel’s guidance to Members about moderating and blocking social media users, and the effects of AI on politicians’ use of social media.
The learning objectives for attorneys include:
• Understand the best legal practices for politicians using social media.
• Understand the new caselaw developments in the social media space as they relate to politicians on social media.
• Understand the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on politicians’ use of social media.
In recent years, the enforcement of commercial and investment arbitration awards against sovereigns ...
90% of legal services will be delivered online by 2030. Don’t get left behind as the industry ...
When lawyers represent clients in litigation, those lawyers assume the role of advocate. Of course, ...
The presenter will be describing her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30 years of sobrie...
Every business has a brand, and most have more than one. What are the basic intellectual property co...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
As any of the recent legal news stories about artificial intelligence clarify, the legal world becom...
This Continuing Legal Education presentation covers electronic discovery and the related ethical dut...
Sometimes in a negotiation, you find your hands tied. You can't back down. Push hard to get a deal, ...
A former complex litigation judge suggests winning strategies for making lawsuits faster and less ex...