The Intersection of Client Confidentiality, Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product

12 Oct , 2023

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

The lawyer’s ethical obligation of confidentiality, the attorney-client privilege, and the attorney work product doctrine are three similar, but different concepts. Many lawyers and judges do not understand how they differ, and thus litigating these issues can be an extremely tricky and dangerous path. 

This program will provide a detailed dive into each of these concepts and how to ensure that lawyers maximize the benefits of these concepts for their clients and themselves. We will be referencing the following ABA rules: 1.6, 1.13, 3.4(a),4.4(b)

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

Effective Advocacy i...

Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...

Identifying and Miti...

This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...

The AI Trap: How Leg...

Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...

Mastering Deposition...

This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...

Reflection on Separa...

Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...

White Collar Sentenc...

This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...

Freedom of Informati...

During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...

Complying with the M...

This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...

Legal Challenges in ...

Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...

Class Actions...

Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...