This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inventions and provides strategic guidance for prosecution and litigation. Attendees will analyze the Federal Circuit's Recentive Analytics v. Fox decision (April 2025), which held that applying generic machine learning to new data environments is patent-ineligible absent technological improvements to the ML process itself; the August 4, 2025 memorandum from Deputy Commissioner Charles Kim reminding examiners to limit mental process groupings to claims that cannot practically be performed in the human mind, distinguish claims that recite versus merely involve judicial exceptions, analyze claims as a whole, and apply the preponderance standard for rejections; USPTO Director John Squires' precedential Ex parte Desjardins decision (September 2025, designated precedential November 2025), which reversed a PTAB § 101 rejection and found that improvements to ML model operation constitute patent-eligible technological advancements under Enfish; and Director Squires' December 4, 2025 memoranda on Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations (SMEDs), which encourage applicants to submit Rule 132 declarations with objective evidence demonstrating that claimed inventions cannot practically be performed in the human mind or provide technological improvements, and require examiners to consider and address such evidence.
Attorneys will learn to:
• Draft AI/ML claims emphasizing technological improvements that satisfy Recentive requirements.
• Leverage the Kim memo, Desjardins, and SMED guidance to challenge improper § 101 rejections.
• Prepare effective SMEDs using objective evidence and expert testimony.
• Identify patent-eligible improvements in client inventions.
• Develop prosecution strategies aligned with current USPTO policy.
• Counsel clients on portfolio development in light of these favorable developments.
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...