Litigation Series: When Words Become Action: The Physical Power of Speech in the Courtroom – Part II

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please check back later.

Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles operate as strategic advocacy tools in modern trial practice. Drawing on historically recognized principles of rhetoric, the program explains how variations in clarity, moral weight, emotional force, credibility, and pacing influence how jurors interpret evidence and evaluate advocates. These stylistic elements are presented not as literary theory, but as practical mechanisms for guiding juror reasoning and decision-making.

Participants will explore how skilled trial lawyers deliberately shift rhetorical style at different stages of litigation—using clarity to orient jurors, moral force to emphasize wrongdoing, sincerity to address weaknesses, and controlled intensity during cross-examination or closing argument. The session provides concrete courtroom applications showing how stylistic alignment strengthens credibility, reinforces case themes, and avoids juror resistance. By integrating classical style with modern trial advocacy, attorneys gain tools for delivering arguments that are structured, persuasive, and firmly grounded in legal practice.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please check back later.