Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
Unrecorded time, vague entries, and end-of-month write-offs cost firms significant revenue. This pra...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Attendees will learn how to effectively cross-examine witnesses at trial. The conventional wis...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
Every IP question a client brings starts with two decisions: which regime (patent, trademark, copyri...