Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This presentation provides a basic overview of AI governance in the United States for in-house attor...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...