Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...