Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This presentation provides a basic overview of AI governance in the United States for in-house attor...