Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Most lawyers are aware of the high-profile cases in which attorneys were sanctioned or otherwise dis...