Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...