Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This presentation provides a basic overview of AI governance in the United States for in-house attor...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...