Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...