Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...