Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This seminar concerns a scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act. The Act ...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...