Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...