Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This presentation serves as a critical follow-up to the June 12, 2026, session on PTAB Discretionary...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...