Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...