Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This presentation serves as a critical follow-up to the June 12, 2026, session on PTAB Discretionary...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...