Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
The United States Constitution is one of the most influential legal documents in history, establishi...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...