Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Different situations call for different tactics. Sometimes, the parties are both amenable to seeking...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...