Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
Effective courtroom advocacy requires more than a command of the facts and law; it also demands the ...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
Unrecorded time, vague entries, and end-of-month write-offs cost firms significant revenue. This pra...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...