Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...