Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...