Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...