Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Every IP question a client brings starts with two decisions: which regime (patent, trademark, copyri...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Most lawyers are aware of the high-profile cases in which attorneys were sanctioned or otherwise dis...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...