Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Attorneys and law firms are well known vectors for money laundering risk. Banks regularly labe...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
This dynamic and compelling presentation explores how chronic stress, sleep deprivation, and substan...