Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...