Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...