Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...