Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...