Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Designed for beginning estate planning attorneys, this comprehensive course provides a practical fou...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...