Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
This timely program will help make sense of a legal landscape in flux, as the presenter explains the...
Different situations call for different tactics. Sometimes, the parties are both amenable to seeking...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
MODERATED-This course is designed to inform patent practitioners on the bounds of the Hatch-Waxman S...