Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This CLE program equips attorneys to advise clients on the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ari...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...