Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
This course is meant for lawyers of all levels and areas of practice, and in it, we will explore way...