Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...