Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...