Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
The United States Constitution is one of the most influential legal documents in history, establishi...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...