Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...