Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This CLE program gives attorneys a practical command of the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ar...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...