Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Abrasive or burned out? Overworked or uncivil? Zealous advocate or bully? The legal profession is c...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...