Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Session 3 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...
The course will begin by describing what Agentic AI is and how it differs from Generative AI; how it...
Balance billing in healthcare, especially in relation to Government Programs poses a significant ris...
As Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals become increasingly common across collegiate athletics, att...
Session 6 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
There are many hidden dangers in frequently used digital tools and media platforms, including social...
Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Permission to Pivot: Ethics, Well-Being, and Redefining Your Legal Career examines the intersection ...