Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...