Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...