Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
For at least the last half-century, the success or failure of most litigations is determined by how ...
Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...