Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...