Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
The course will begin by describing what Agentic AI is and how it differs from Generative AI; how it...
This program will cover the sources from which practitioners can gather documents, witnesses, and ot...
Clear, confident communication is one of the most powerful tools a lawyer can have, yet it’s o...
Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
The GENIUS Act — signed into law on July 18, 2025 — marks the first comprehensive U.S. l...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
Join Steve Herman on December 8, 2025, for "Maintaining Ethical Standards: Essential Strategies for ...
Social media is no longer optional for lawyers who want to build and sustain a thriving practice&mda...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...