Celesq® Programs

Beyond the Prompt: How Law Firms Can Use ChatGPT Without Crossing Ethical Lines

Active
Program Number
36173
Program Date
2026-06-03
CLE Credits
1

ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, legal research support, client communication, internal operations, and administrative tasks. This ethics program examines the use of ChatGPT through the framework of ABA Formal Opinion 512 and ABA Model Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.1, 3.3, 5.1, 5.3, and 8.4(c). Attendees will learn how duties of competence, diligence, communication, confidentiality, fee reasonableness, meritorious advocacy, candor to the tribunal, supervision, and honesty apply when lawyers and law firms use ChatGPT in everyday practice. The program also addresses prompt discipline, hallucinated citations and facts, overreliance on AI output, disclosure issues, billing for AI-assisted work, and the lawyer’s continuing duty to review and verify all AI-assisted work product before it is shared with a client, third party, or tribunal. ABA Formal Opinion 512 specifically identifies these core duties when lawyers use generative AI tools. 

The program further provides a practical overview of OpenAI’s current data controls, plan structure, and privacy implications for legal users. It explains why consumer ChatGPT use and business workspace use are not ethically interchangeable, what lawyers should understand before entering confidential or sensitive information into the platform, and how OpenAI’s current settings affect the risk analysis. OpenAI states that individual ChatGPT content may be used to improve its models unless the user turns that setting off, that Temporary Chat does not appear in chat history and is not used to train models, and that business products such as ChatGPT Business and Enterprise are not used to train on workspace data by default. It also states that business offerings include additional privacy and administrative controls that may matter in a law firm environment. 

ABA Authorities Covered:

  • ABA Formal Opinion 512 (Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools)
  • Model Rule 1.1 (Competence)
  • Model Rule 1.3 (Diligence)
  • Model Rule 1.4 (Communication)
  • Model Rule 1.5 (Fees)
  • Model Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information)
  • Model Rule 3.1 (Meritorious Claims and Contentions)
  • Model Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal)
  • Model Rule 5.1 (Responsibilities of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Lawyers); Model Rule 5.3 (Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistance)
  • Model Rule 8.4(c) (Misconduct) 

This course provides ethics guidance grounded in ABA authorities. Attorneys remain responsible for reviewing the rules, ethics opinions, court rules, and technology guidance that apply in their own jurisdiction.

Available in States

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Texas Self Study

Program Categories

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Communication Skills
  • Communications and Media Law
  • Ethics & Professionalism
  • Federal Courts
  • Florida Eligible
  • Legal Research and Writing

PROGRAM CREDITS

  • Legal Ethics : 1 Credit